Lower-calorie end
164 kcal per 100g raw in this featured set
Use this page to check beef steak calories per 100g, protein in steak 100g, total fat, iron, and zinc across common steak-style cuts. The table stays on one per 100 gram raw reference basis so you can scan steak macros per 100 grams without mixing cooked weight changes into the baseline.
Featured steak-style cuts in this shared reference set range from 164 to 291 calories, 18.9 to 27 grams of protein, and 7.6 to 23.8 grams of fat per 100g raw.
Main table
This table is built for fast scanning. It answers the exact steak-per-100g query while keeping the cut differences visible instead of flattening every steak into one generic number.
| Steak cut | Calories | Protein | Fat | Sat fat | Iron | Zinc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ribeye Steak | 291 kcal | 18.9 g | 23.8 g | 9.9 g | 1.70 mg | 4.10 mg |
| Sirloin Steak (Top Sirloin) | 183 kcal | 27 g | 7.6 g | 2.9 g | 1.80 mg | 5 mg |
| Tenderloin (Filet Mignon) | 227 kcal | 20.9 g | 15 g | 5.9 g | 2.10 mg | 4.40 mg |
| Strip Steak (New York Strip) | 252 kcal | 20.2 g | 18.3 g | 7.4 g | 1.90 mg | 4.30 mg |
| Flank Steak | 164 kcal | 20.1 g | 9.4 g | 3.5 g | 1.83 mg | 5.56 mg |
| Tri-Tip | 193 kcal | 21.6 g | 11 g | 4.2 g | 2.10 mg | 4.70 mg |
Values are reference values, not exact readings for every steak at retail. Grade, trim, and how a steak is cooked can shift what you see on a label or plate.
Lower-calorie end
164 kcal per 100g raw in this featured set
Higher protein density
1.48g protein per 10 calories
Higher fat
23.8g total fat per 100g raw
Zinc leader
5.56mg zinc per 100g raw
Variation by cut
Ribeye is the richer end of this featured set, so calories and fat rise quickly even though protein stays substantial.
Top sirloin is the leaner anchor here and currently carries the strongest protein density in this featured steak group.
Tenderloin stays more moderate than ribeye on fat while still showing solid protein, iron, zinc, and B12 context.
Strip steak usually lands between sirloin and ribeye for calories and fat, which makes it useful as a middle-ground reference.
Flank steak stays on the lower-calorie side in this dataset while still carrying notable fat and one of the stronger zinc readings.
Tri-tip sits in the mid-range for steak-style calories and fat, which makes it a helpful bridge between leaner and richer references.
Raw vs cooked
Example portions
| Portion | Calories range | Protein range | Fat range |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100g | 164-291 kcal | 18.9-27 g | 7.6-23.8 g |
| 200g | 328-582 kcal | 37.8-54 g | 15.2-47.6 g |
| 250g | 410-728 kcal | 47.3-67.5 g | 19-59.5 g |
These ranges use the featured steak-style cuts on this page, so they show why a single universal “200g steak” macro number can hide the real cut differences.
FAQ
In this steak-focused raw-reference set, featured cuts span about 164 to 291 calories per 100 grams raw. Ribeye sits toward the richer end, while sirloin, flank, and similar leaner steak references sit lower.
The featured steak cuts on this page range from about 18.9 to 27.0 grams of protein per 100 grams raw. The exact number depends on which steak cut you mean, not just the word steak by itself.
This page stays anchored to a per 100 gram raw reference. Many generic steak pages use cooked-looking numbers or do not label the basis clearly, which is why raw and cooked pages often look inconsistent.
Steak cuts differ in marbling, trim, and total fat. That shifts calories and fat more dramatically than it shifts protein, which is why ribeye, sirloin, flank, strip steak, and tenderloin do not share one universal macro number.
Use the linked raw-vs-cooked converter for cut-aware cooked estimates. This guide stays on one raw-reference basis so the table remains easier to compare and does not mix finished-weight changes into the baseline.
Compare calories, protein, fat, iron, and price across common beef cuts.
Calculate calories, protein, iron, zinc, and cooking-adjusted values for common beef cuts.
Convert raw beef to cooked weight or cooked beef back to a raw equivalent with cut-aware yield profiles.
The steak values on this page come from the same shared site dataset used by the live cut pages and comparison system. That dataset is maintained from USDA FoodData Central raw beef reference records.
The goal here is easier cut comparison. Keeping the table on one per 100 gram raw basis avoids blending cooked weight change into the base numbers and makes the steak-to-steak spread easier to read.
Retail trim, grade, fat level, and whether a site is showing raw or cooked values can all change the number a user sees. This page solves that by labeling the basis clearly and keeping the featured cut variation visible.