Ground Beef Ratio Comparison Tool
Compare 73/27, 80/20, 85/15, 90/10, and 93/7 ground beef on one shared raw-reference basis, then switch into custom raw or cooked portion math when you want a practical estimate for patties, crumbles, loafs, or meatballs.
Main comparison tool
Compare common ground beef lean ratios side by side
Keep the raw per 100g reference as the baseline, then switch into custom raw or cooked portion math only when you want a live estimate.
Choose between two and five ratios. The main table keeps all selected ratios in the same order every time.
All columns show per 100g raw reference values.
Metrics Compare lean ratio differences on the same view before switching to another state or amount. | 80/20 Higher fatShared data anchor 80% lean20% fat USDA FoodData Central raw beef reference (FDC 174045) | 90/10 Leaner ratioHigher protein densityShared data anchor 90% lean10% fat USDA FoodData Central raw beef reference (FDC 174044) |
|---|---|---|
Calories Calories for the current view | 254 kcal | 176 kcal |
Protein Total protein for the current view | 17.2 g | 20 g |
Protein per 10 calories Higher means more protein relative to calories | 0.68 g | 1.14 g |
Total fat Fat changes most across lean ratios | 20 g | 10 g |
Saturated fat Shown separately from total fat | 7.7 g | 4.4 g |
Iron Per current portion or raw reference view | 2 mg | 2.20 mg |
Zinc Per current portion or raw reference view | 4.50 mg | 5.20 mg |
Vitamin B12 Per current portion or raw reference view | 2.10 mcg | 2.30 mcg |
Selenium Per current portion or raw reference view | 14.2 mcg | 16.2 mcg |
Lean / fat split Ratio bar stays fixed while the nutrient rows change with the current view. | 80% lean20% fat | 90% lean10% fat |
90/10
Leaner ratioHigher protein densityReading the table
Keep raw-reference values and cooked estimates separate
Raw reference
The core ratio table stays anchored to per 100g raw values. That keeps the calorie, protein, and fat scan consistent across every ratio.
Cooked estimate
Cooked custom views use the selected cooking profile to estimate finished weight. Drained crumbles use a lighter retained-fat model than undrained crumbles.
Source strength
80/20 and 90/10 stay anchored to the shared site dataset. 73/27, 85/15, and 93/7 stay visible as raw ratio comparison references with clear source labeling.
What the ratios mean
The first number is the lean share and the second number is the fat share
About 73% lean and 27% fat by weight before cooking.
About 80% lean and 20% fat by weight before cooking.
About 85% lean and 15% fat by weight before cooking.
About 90% lean and 10% fat by weight before cooking.
About 93% lean and 7% fat by weight before cooking.
Popular comparisons
Start with the most common ground beef questions
80/20 vs 90/10
90/10 shows fewer calories and less fat per 100g raw than 80/20, while 90/10 carries the stronger protein-per-calorie profile.
85/15 vs 93/7
93/7 shows fewer calories and less fat per 100g raw than 85/15, while 93/7 carries the stronger protein-per-calorie profile.
93/7 nutrition
Open the focused guide for 93/7 calories, protein, fat, and how it compares with richer common ratios.
Raw vs cooked ground beef
Cooked views are optional estimate layers, not replacements for the raw reference
The default view keeps all ratios on one shared raw reference so the comparison stays stable.
Switch to cooked weight only when you actually measured the finished portion and want a form-specific estimate.
Drained crumbles keep a separate estimate because finished fat and calories can shift more than a simple patty or loaf assumption.
FAQ
Common questions about lean percentages and cooked estimates
What does 80/20 ground beef mean?
It means the package is labeled as about 80 percent lean meat and 20 percent fat by weight before cooking.
Which ground beef ratio has less fat?
Within the ratios shown here, the higher lean-number labels such as 90/10 and 93/7 carry less fat per 100 grams raw than 80/20 or 73/27.
Why do cooked values look different from raw values?
Cooked portions weigh less after moisture loss, and drained crumbles can also lose rendered fat. That changes the finished weight and can make cooked portions look more concentrated per gram.
How accurate are the cooked estimates?
Cooked views are planning estimates. The strongest anchors on this page are the raw per 100 gram ratio references, while cooked results depend on the cooking form and whether the crumbles are drained.
Why does this page use 73/27 instead of 70/30?
This system keeps 73/27 as the highest-fat common ratio because it fits the current site reference model more cleanly. Some stores may use nearby shorthand labels, but the comparison table stays on one fixed ratio set.
Data & methodology
One raw-reference table with separate cooked-form estimate logic
Raw-reference ratios
80/20 and 90/10 stay anchored to the shared site dataset. 73/27, 85/15, and 93/7 remain explicit ratio comparison references in the same per 100g raw format.
Lean label context
Ratio labels show the lean and fat split by weight. Label words like lean or extra lean follow separate FSIS nutrient-threshold rules, so they do not always map one-to-one with a ratio nickname.
Cooked estimates
Cooked custom views estimate finished weight from the selected cooking form. Drained crumbles use a lighter retained-fat model than undrained crumbles.
Related tools
Beef Nutrition by Cut
Open the guide hub for shared raw-reference cut charts, comparison links, and system-level methodology.
Raw vs Cooked Beef Weight Converter
Convert raw beef to cooked weight or cooked beef back to a raw equivalent with cut-aware yield profiles.
Beef Nutrition Calculator
Calculate calories, protein, iron, zinc, and cooking-adjusted values for common beef cuts.
Compare Beef Cuts
Compare calories, protein, fat, iron, and price across common beef cuts.
BBQ Meat Calculator
Plan how much beef to buy for cookouts, parties, and larger gatherings.