Informational and journaling-oriented beef reference

Beef Nutrition by Cut

Compare calories, protein, fat, iron, zinc, vitamin B12, and price context across common beef cuts using one shared per 100 gram raw reference system. This page is designed for nutrition logging, meal planning, and straightforward cut comparison.

Leaner profile

Sirloin Steak (Top Sirloin)

7.6g fat per 100g raw

Higher fat

Ribeye Steak

23.8g fat per 100g raw

Protein density

Sirloin Steak (Top Sirloin)

1.48g per 10 calories

Reference price

Ground Beef 90/10

$6.99/lb lower reference average among featured cuts

Popular cuts at a glance

The table below keeps every cut on the same per 100 gram raw reference basis so you can scan differences quickly before opening a deeper calculator or cut page.

CutCaloriesProteinFatIronReference price
Ribeye Steak291 kcal18.9 g23.8 g1.70 mg$15.99/lb
Sirloin Steak (Top Sirloin)183 kcal27 g7.6 g1.80 mg$9.99/lb
Tenderloin (Filet Mignon)227 kcal20.9 g15 g2.10 mg$28.99/lb
Flank Steak164 kcal20.1 g9.4 g1.83 mg$8.99/lb
Ground Beef 90/10176 kcal20 g10 g2.20 mg$6.99/lb
Chuck Roast233 kcal18.7 g17 g2.40 mg$6.99/lb

Why cuts differ

Use one reference system, then compare the cut characteristics

Steaks from rib and loin sections often spread out more on fat and calories than they do on protein.
Sirloin, flank, and round-style references often look leaner than ribeye, brisket, and short-rib style cuts.
Ground beef depends heavily on lean ratio, so ratio comparison now has its own dedicated guide and tool.
Price, cooking method, trim, and store labeling can move the real-world context even when the base nutrition reference stays the same.

Use cases

Use this system for planning, logging, and cut comparison

Meal planning

Compare leaner and richer cuts before deciding what to buy for a week of meals.

Nutrition logging

Anchor your scan to one per 100g raw reference before switching to custom serving calculators.

Shopping decisions

Check price context, protein density, and fat differences side by side.

Bulk buying

Use this hub as the front door into freezer, cost, and hanging-weight planning tools.

Frequently asked

Common questions before comparing cuts

What does “beef nutrition by cut” mean on this page?

This page compares common cuts on the same per 100 gram raw reference basis so you can scan calories, protein, fat, and key nutrients without switching between unrelated data sources.

Are the values shown here per 100g raw?

Yes. The guide hub stays anchored to per 100 gram raw reference values. If you want custom serving math, the linked comparison and nutrition tools handle that separately.

Why do cuts differ so much in calories and fat?

Cuts from different parts of the animal vary in marbling, trim, and fat content. That changes calories and total fat more dramatically than it changes protein.

Which beef cuts usually look leaner on a nutrition table?

Leaner-looking cuts often come from sirloin, flank, round, or tenderloin-style references, while ribeye, brisket, and short-rib style cuts usually carry more fat and calories.

Can I use this page for meal planning or logging?

Yes. This page is built as an informational and journaling-oriented reference. For custom serving sizes, cut-to-cut choices, and portion math, move into the linked calculators.

Related tools, cut pages, and next guides

Data and methodology

Shared source layer

Featured cuts read from the same shared beef dataset used by the cut pages and compare tool. That dataset is maintained from USDA FoodData Central raw-reference records.

Per 100g raw baseline

The guide stays anchored to one per 100 gram raw reference system so users can compare cuts without mixing cooked and raw values.

Reference price context

Reference average prices are shown for planning context only. They help compare cuts, but they should not be read as live national shelf quotes for every store, trim, or grade.